Home · Where it is allowed · Demo play, no-deposit offers and free tournaments in Belgium
Jurisdiction · BE
Demo play, no-deposit offers and free tournaments in Belgium
Four questions and the rule behind each one. This page names no operator and carries no commercial link, because a page about the law of a market should not also be an advertisement inside it.
| Question | Answer | What the rule says | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public demo without an account | A game with no stake sits outside the gambling act, but may fall under the lottery rules. | Trade source | |
| Age verified before the demo | Not verified. | Not verified | |
| No-deposit offers | Forbidden: the 2024 amendments reach free participation and play credits as well. | Trade source | |
| Free tournaments | Most likely forbidden as an inducement, under the same provision. | Trade source |
- Authority
- Commission des jeux de hasard
- Official register
- gamingcommission.be/fr/operateurs/licences
- Minimum age
- 21
- Self-exclusion and help
- EPIS (self-exclusion); SOS Jeux 0800 35 777
Twenty-one, and the reason that number has to come first
Most of this record runs on eighteen, and Belgium does not. The minimum age for every form of gambling and betting here is twenty-one (raised across the board, and applying to betting as much as to casino games), which means that a page addressed to a Belgian reader cannot carry the same standing notice as the page beside it.
That is the easy part of the Belgian answer. The hard part is a paradox that runs through the rest of this page, and it is worth stating before the detail arrives: the same free game is outside the gambling act when you look at it as a game, and inside a prohibition when you look at it as an inducement.
A game with no stake is not a "game of chance" for the purposes of the act, because the stake is part of the definition itself and there is nothing here to put at risk (the definition sits in the act, where it has more than one limb). A free entry handed out to attract a player is a "free participation" in the sense of the 2024 amendment, and free participation is now forbidden.
Both propositions are true at once, and in our reading the second does more work than the first; a Belgian operator may therefore be entirely free to build a trial and entirely unable to offer one as part of anything that looks like a "welcome offer"!
A free game sits outside the gambling act, and that settles less than it looks
The first proposition comes from the structure of the statute rather than from a provision about demos. Free games do not qualify as games of chance under the gaming act because they do not involve a stake of any kind, which puts a pure "practice play" mode in the same position it occupies in Denmark (where the licence test needs a stake as well, and fails without one).
Belgium then adds a second body of law that Denmark does not, and this is the part trade summaries miss. A free operation can qualify as a lottery, and the lottery regime is not inside the gaming act at all: it sits in the criminal code (article 301) and in an act of 31 December 1851, with the national lottery holding the monopoly (an act of 1851, which is still live law and still enforced).
The consequence is that "a free game is lawful" is a sentence we are not prepared to write about Belgium without qualification. A prize draw dressed as a tournament, a "freeroll" with a real reward, a competition attached to a "lobby" of free titles: each of those can be pulled into the lottery analysis, and that analysis is a criminal one (article 301 sits in the criminal code, which is not the gaming act).
We mark the first box above as a partial answer for exactly that reason, and the level column says trade source instead of primary. Nothing in what we read tells us how the regulator draws the line between a free game and a free "lottery", and the line is where the whole question lives.
The 2024 amendment, which took the bonus and the free entry together
The amending act of 2024 is the instrument that changed this market, and its drafting is unusually direct. Online operators may no longer offer "free participation" in games, may no longer hand out "gaming credits", and may no longer provide any form of "inducement" offered in order to influence a player's gaming behaviour (a formula wide enough to cover most of what the trade calls a "bonus").
The prohibition reaches land-based and online gambling together, with a limited exception for the physical casinos, which tells you something about where the political pressure came from. A "no deposit" offer is accordingly not a regulated product in Belgium; it is a prohibited one (prohibited as a product, which is a stronger thing than prohibited as a message).
The tournament row above is a refusal for the same reason rather than for one of its own. A free tournament is an "incentive" designed to influence gaming behaviour on any ordinary reading of those words, and we treat it as caught, while recording that this is our construction of the amendment and not a published decision about tournaments.
Two sentences of that amendment do more to shape an affiliate's options in Belgium than every rule about demo play in this collection put together. One of them removes the product; the other, in the advertising regime, removes the channel!
Two numbers worth remembering
The age is twenty-one rather than eighteen, and the criminal exposure for advertising an unauthorised game runs from two hundred and eight euro to five hundred and seventy-six thousand. The second number applies to anybody, which includes a writer who is not an operator.
Advertising is prohibited in principle, and the exception is narrow
The rule on Belgian gambling advertising is stated as a negative with an opening in it: all advertising is in principle prohibited except where it is expressly authorised (the formula is the regulator's own, and it is one that repays attention), and the authorisation comes from the gaming act as amended together with a royal decree of 27 February 2023.
What a licensed online operator may actually do under that authorisation is narrower than most readers expect, because the text lists what is permitted instead of listing what is forbidden. It may advertise on its own site and on its own official social channels, without interaction, with any moving image kept to five seconds, and without compensating a third party for the publication (five seconds, which is shorter than a "spin" of most slots).
That last condition is the one worth underlining, and it is why this page has the shape it has. An affiliate is a third party who is compensated for publication, which makes the usual arrangement of this trade structurally unavailable in Belgium rather than merely regulated (there is no compliant version of a paid placement).
Beside that sits a prohibition addressed to everybody and not only to licensees: no person may advertise an unauthorised game or recruit players for one (articles 4 §2 and 61 of the gaming act of 7 May 1999). Personalised advertising is prohibited as well, which closes the remaining door.
How far the reading goes, and where it halts
Three of the answers above are weaker than we would like, and the weakness has one cause: the Belgian material we worked from is a professional guide to the law rather than the consolidated statute and the royal decrees themselves, which we mark in the level column as a "trade source".
On the age question we found nothing at all. No duty to verify a visitor's age before a "trial version" opens has been established here, and the box says "not verified" rather than offering the comfortable inference that twenty-one must apply to everything (it may well, and we did not read it anywhere).
The lottery boundary is the second gap, and it interests us rather more. We did not establish how a free operation is distinguished from a lottery in practice, which means that anybody planning a free competition for Belgian players needs advice rather than a page, and should treat the 1851 act as live law (an act of 31 December 1851, which has outlived most of what once surrounded it).
If you are reading this as a player, the two useful addresses are the licence register and the national "self-exclusion" list, both run from the gaming commission's own site (the commission publishes both, and neither of them asks that you open an account). Your own position in Belgium turns on the age before anything else, and twenty-one is not a rounding of eighteen.
What is the minimum gambling age in Belgium?
Twenty-one, for every form of gambling and betting, which is three years above the figure used in most of the markets covered by this record.
Are offers without a deposit permitted?
No. The amendment of 2024 removed online bonuses, and it names free participation in games and gaming credits among the things an operator may no longer provide.
Does a free game sit outside Belgian gambling law?
Outside the gaming act, since there is no stake, but a free operation can still be caught by the lottery regime in the criminal code and in the act of 1851.
May a Belgian licence holder pay an affiliate?
The permission to advertise covers an operator's own site and its own official social channels, without interaction, and without compensating a third party for the publication.